The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Assessing with an attitude: tutor assessment feedback on business students’ academic writing

Shrestha, Prithvi (2018). Assessing with an attitude: tutor assessment feedback on business students’ academic writing. In: 28th European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference: Systemic Functional Linguistics on Language, Specialised Knowledge and Literacy, 5-7 Jul 2018, University of Pavia, Italy, European Systemic Functional Linguistics Association.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (963kB) | Preview
URL: http://www-7.unipv.it/28esflc/wp-content/uploads/2...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In higher education, it has widely been recognized that tutor feedback on assessment should be learning-oriented (e.g., Nicol, 2010; Shrestha & Coffin, 2012). However, there is a lack of research which examines tutor assessment feedback in disciplines such as business management through a linguistic lens contributing to this field of research. The use of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), especially APPRAISAL framework (Martin & White, 2005), to explore this aspect is limited in the assessment literature (e.g., see Hyland & Hyland, 2006; Starfield et al., 2015). Drawing on the APPRAISAL framework (Hood, 2010; Martin & White, 2005), this paper examines the evaluative language used in the formative feedback provided by tutors on eight undergraduate business students’ academic writing in two assignments. The data consisted of tutor feedback summaries by six tutors on 16 assignments and semi-structured interviews with eight students at The Open University, UK. The feedback summaries were examined through the system of ATTITUDE, ENGAGEMENT and GRADUATION as developed within the APPRAISAL framework to explore the nature of the tutor assessment feedback and the student interviews were thematically examined which provided insights into their perceptions of tutor feedback and assessment. The findings revealed that the tutor feedback varied significantly across the feedback summaries examined regarding not only the length and details but also the type of evaluative language used. The tutors tended to use the language of ATTITUDE, especially JUDGEMENT and APPRECIATION, and most tutors allowed limited feedback dialogue (ENGAGEMENT). These findings have implications for improving tutor formative feedback practices in disciplinary writing.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Keywords: appraisal framework; formative feedback; business studies; academic writing; systemic functional linguistics; tutor feedback summary
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Languages and Applied Linguistics > Languages
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Languages and Applied Linguistics
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Research Group: Language & Literacies
Item ID: 56107
Depositing User: Prithvi Shrestha
Date Deposited: 28 Aug 2018 16:14
Last Modified: 08 Dec 2018 11:06
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/56107
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU