The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

How do students engage with Computer-Based Assessments: Impact of study breaks on intertemporal engagement and pass rates

Nguyen, Quan; Thorne, Sam and Rienties, Bart (2018). How do students engage with Computer-Based Assessments: Impact of study breaks on intertemporal engagement and pass rates. Behaviormetrika (In Press).

Full text available as:
Full text not publicly available (Accepted Manuscript)
Due to publisher licensing restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Study breaks and exam revision weeks are increasingly embedded in learning design under the assumption that students would make use of this time to catch up with their study or prepare for upcoming assessment tasks. However, there remains a paucity of empirical evidence to evaluate to what extent the implementation of study breaks, preparation and exam revision weeks impact students’ engagement and academic performance. By applying learning analytics in a Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) setting, this study investigates how study break weeks and assessment preparation weeks impacted the odds of passing a module using a mixed effect logistic regression on 123,916 undergraduate students in 205 modules over several semesters from 2015-2017 at the Open University. Furthermore, we investigated the intertemporal characteristics of student engagement during preparation weeks for a final assessment in an Introductory Business course over three semesters. A mixed-effect logistic regression was used to model behavioural engagement of 3,385 students on the VLE (i.e. click counts) over three semesters during the assessment preparation weeks. Our findings indicated a positive association between study breaks and the odds of passing a course, while there was no statistically significant effect in relation to the number of assessment preparation and revision weeks. Analysis of behavioural engagement on the VLE suggested that there was a higher proportion of passed students remained active during preparation and exam revision weeks compared to failed students. Compared to the pass group, the fail group also exhibited a stronger pattern of procrastination. This study offers new insights that could help institution management and course designer to evaluate the efficacy of using of study breaks and exam preparation weeks to improve student retention.

Item Type: Journal Item
ISSN: 1349-6964
Keywords: Computer-Based Assessment; Engagement; Temporality; Learning Analytics; Academic performance.
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Professional Services
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 55977
Depositing User: Bart Rienties
Date Deposited: 01 Aug 2018 13:34
Last Modified: 15 Sep 2018 05:29
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/55977
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU