Ethnomethodological criticism of ethnography

Hammersley, Martyn (2019). Ethnomethodological criticism of ethnography. Qualitative Research, 19(5) pp. 578–593.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118781383

Abstract

Ethnomethodologists have made some fundamental criticisms of conventional forms of ethnography. For example, it has been argued that they fail to examine the processes through which the phenomena studied have been constituted, and that they lack rigour because they rely upon unexplicated common-sense knowledge. In my view, these criticisms have not been given sufficient attention. This article outlines them in detail and then goes on to provide an evaluation. It is concluded that they do not provide a sufficient basis for the radical-re-specification of the focus of inquiry that ethnomethodologists propose. However, they do raise issues to which ethnographers should give more attention.

Viewing alternatives

Metrics

Public Attention

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Number of Citations

Citations from Dimensions

Item Actions

Export

About

  • Item ORO ID
  • 55726
  • Item Type
  • Journal Item
  • ISSN
  • 1741-3109
  • Keywords
  • construction of social phenomena; ethnomethodology; ethnography; reflexivity; rigour in qualitative research
  • Academic Unit or School
  • Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
  • Copyright Holders
  • © 2018 The Author
  • SWORD Depositor
  • Jisc Publications-Router
  • Depositing User
  • Jisc Publications-Router

Recommendations