The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Lesbianism and Feminist Legislation in 1921: the Age of Consent and 'Gross Indecency between Women'

Derry, Caroline (2018). Lesbianism and Feminist Legislation in 1921: the Age of Consent and 'Gross Indecency between Women'. History Workshop Journal, 86 pp. 245–267.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Submitted Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (127kB) | Preview
Full text not publicly available (Accepted Manuscript)
Due to publisher licensing restrictions, this file is not available for public download until 12 July 2020
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dby021
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the early twentieth century a large network of organisations, co-ordinated by the Association for Moral and Social Hygiene, campaigned for changes to the law on sexual offences. In particular, they sought to strengthen age of consent law for the protection of young girls. Their efforts resulted in the introduction of a Criminal Law Amendment Bill in 1921; it would have raised the age of consent for indecent assault and removed significant weaknesses in the existing legislation which made prosecution for age of consent offences difficult.

However, there was active opposition to the Bill, often anti-feminist in tone. An amendment was introduced by the Bill’s opponents to create an offence of “gross indecency between females”. That offence, if enacted, would have made all sexual activity between women criminal. The amendment was a ‘spoiling amendment’, designed to directly attack the Bill and those feminist organisations supporting it.

This amendment not only led to the Bill’s failure but posed great difficulties for the AMSH and others in formulating a response. Above all, lesbianism was considered publicly unspeakable, as the parliamentary debates themselves made clear. The very knowledge of what it was could be considered as evidence of corruption and lack of purity. What answer could respectable women therefore make? This paper explores the ways in which the Bill’s supporters, particularly the AMSH, responded to the amendment.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2018 The Authors
ISSN: 1477-4569
Keywords: law; legislation; law reform; history; feminism; sexuality; gender; 1921; lesbianism; age of consent; AMSH; parliament
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Law
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Item ID: 55535
Depositing User: Caroline Derry
Date Deposited: 21 Jun 2018 13:30
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2019 16:05
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/55535
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU