Carr, Susan and Oreszczyn, Sue
PDF (Not Set)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
From the introduction Drawing on a study of members of the UK’s Agriculture and Biotechnology Commission, this paper
explores the use of Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH) as a structured approach to the inclusion of
ethics and values in complex policy decisions.
CSH was devised by Ulrich in a planning context, as a way of making explicit the value assumptions
underlying practical judgements by means of critical reflection. It is rooted in Critical Systems
Thinking, which challenged earlier notions of systems thinking by introducing a more socially aware
and critical form of systems practice.
Ulrich used the concept of system boundaries to provide a conceptual framework for dealing with the
facts and values that underlie a decision. The CSH framework encourages people to consider critically
such matters as what counts as an ethically-defendable 'improvement', who should benefit, and what
should count as relevant knowledge and sources of expertise.
This paper highlights some of the advantages and disadvantages of CSH as a tool for achieving a more
inclusive, critical and self-reflective approach to decision making about genetically modified crops.
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Extra Information:||PDF attached differs from the paper given at the Conference.|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing & Communications
Mathematics, Computing and Technology
Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Engineering & Innovation
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD)|
|Depositing User:||Users 13 not found.|
|Date Deposited:||27 Sep 2006|
|Last Modified:||23 Feb 2016 17:41|
|Share this page:|