The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Development of tools to measure dignity for older people in acute hospitals

Tauber-Gilmore, Marcelle; Norton, Christine; Procter, Sue; Murrells, Trevor; Addis, Gulen; Baillie, Lesley; Velasco, Pauline; Athwal, Preet; Kayani, Saeema and Zahran, Zainab (2018). Development of tools to measure dignity for older people in acute hospitals. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(19-20) pp. 3706–3718.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (223kB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14490
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Dignity is a concept that applies to all patients. Older patients can be particularly vulnerable to experiencing a loss of dignity in hospital. Previous tools developed to measure dignity have been aimed at palliative and end of life care. No tools for measuring dignity in acute hospital care have been reported.
Objectives: To develop tools for measuring patient dignity in acute hospitals.
Setting: A large UK acute hospital. We purposively selected 17 wards where at least 50% of patients are 65 or over.
Methods: Three methods of capturing data related to dignity were developed: an electronic patient dignity survey (possible score range 6-24); a format for non-participant observations; and individual face-to-face semi-structured patient and staff interviews (reported elsewhere).
Results: 5693 surveys were completed. Mean score increased from 22.00 pre-intervention to 23.03 after intervention (p<0.001). Staff-patient interactions (581) were recorded. Overall 41% of interactions (239) were positive, 39% (228) were neutral and 20% (114) were nega-tive. The positive interactions ranged from 17% to 59% between wards. Quality of interaction was highest for allied health professionals (76% positive), lowest for domestic staff (22% pos-itive) and pharmacists (29% positive), and intermediate for doctors, nurses, Health Care As-sistants and student nurses (40% to 48% positive). A positive interaction was more likely with increased length of interaction from 25% (brief) to 63% (longer interactions) (F[2, 557]=28.67, p<.001).
Conclusions: We have developed a simple format for a dignity survey and observations. Overall, most patients reported electronically that they received dignified care in hospital. However, observations identified a high percentage of interactions categorised as neu-tral/basic care, which, while not actively diminishing dignity, will not enhance dignity. There is an opportunity make these interactions more positive.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN: 1365-2702
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Not Set357Burdett Trust for Nursing
Keywords: acute care; dignity; older patients; quality of care; questionnaire
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care > Nursing
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Item ID: 54317
Depositing User: Lesley Baillie
Date Deposited: 10 Apr 2018 10:40
Last Modified: 23 May 2019 01:46
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/54317
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU