The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Was Blumer a cognitivist? Assessing an ethnomethodological critique

Hammersley, Martyn (2018). Was Blumer a cognitivist? Assessing an ethnomethodological critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(3) pp. 273–287.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12167
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

A major target of criticism for ethnomethodology has been cognitivism. In its broadest sense this term refers to any account of human behaviour that treats psychological features of agents – including beliefs, attitudes, and interpretations – as factors explaining their behaviour. While much criticism of cognitivism has been directed at neuroscientists and philosophical materialists, the range of targets has been wider than this, even including sociologists such as Herbert Blumer and symbolic interactionists. In this article I outline this criticism of Blumer and assess it. My conclusion is that, despite some misreading, his work does fall into the broad category of cognitivism. However, I question the grounds for the ethnomethodological critique.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN: 1468-5914
Keywords: cognitivism; ethnomethodology; Herbert Blumer; ordinary language philosophy; psychologism; symbolic interactionism
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Item ID: 54143
SWORD Depositor: Jisc Publications-Router
Depositing User: Jisc Publications-Router
Date Deposited: 05 Apr 2018 13:33
Last Modified: 14 May 2019 16:16
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/54143
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU