The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Rhetoric of the digitized faculty – a cross cultural ethnographic study of higher education lecturers at the cross-roads of pedagogic change

Glover, H.; Collins, H. and Myers, F. (2017). Rhetoric of the digitized faculty – a cross cultural ethnographic study of higher education lecturers at the cross-roads of pedagogic change. In: EDULEARN17 Proceedings, IATED, pp. 7735–7743.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (116kB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0407
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Following on from a recent study into the impact of automation of student support on facultys’ identity and personal well-being, this paper demonstrates the importance of considering lived in experiences of lecturers during the introduction of a disruptive digitized change strategy in a UK Business School. This second stage reports on a comparative study comparing values and experiences with the UK university and an American university based in the Middle East.

With cost-orientated moves to expanding online provision through emergent technologies and the growth of alternative HE strategies, such as credit-bearing MOOCS, traditional group-orientated student and lecturer interactions are developing into a continuum. Whilst a digitized strategy is aiming to increase student numbers and retention, and has standardised the student experience in terms of academic qualification communications, these messages have necessarily required adjunct teaching staff to learn new processes, thus unlearning previous pedagogical support routines and this has altered their academic role and their perception of their academic identity.

This research was undertaken using auto ethnography and in-depth interviews with lecturers of both institutes, which were transcribed and analysed using content analysis with the aim of uncovering the effect on lecturers identity processes, changes to their role and in consequence their perception of their own academic identity. The investigation adds to emerging literature by examining the underreported lived experiences of faculty at the ‘teaching coal face’ during this period of disruptive change at the UK institute and its impact on a group of teaching academics as an outcome of the change initiative. We then compared this with an emergent rather than radical digitization change process undertaken at the American university.

Study into these changes to academic routines and identity has value, as the shifts in perceived identity demonstrate a tangible impact on the teaching academics’ motivation; their role and perception of their identity and has resulted in resistance to change. This project adds to the literature as much existing retention literature privileges the institutional or student experience, and much of learning / unlearning literature is in a non-educational setting. Therefore combined with academic identity this gives insight into the values of developing an institutional inclusive culture during change processes.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
ISBN: 84-697-3777-5, 978-84-697-3777-4
ISSN: 2340-1117
Keywords: academic identity; change; digitization, academic values
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Law
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Related URLs:
Item ID: 53769
Depositing User: Fran Jones Myers
Date Deposited: 13 Mar 2018 11:48
Last Modified: 02 May 2019 11:18
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/53769
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU