The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Moralizing Strategies in Early Greek Poetry

Allan, William and Swift, Laura eds. (2018). Moralizing Strategies in Early Greek Poetry. Mouseion, 15 (1). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.3138/mous.15.1.2
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The articles collected in this volume were originally presented at a conference held at Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland, in July 2015.

Moralizing, in the sense both of didactic advice and of reflection on received wisdom, is a prevalent feature of ancient Greek literature. Didactic poetry was a long-established genre, first known to us from Hesiod, though with much older roots, but elements of didacticism are important to small-scale non-hexameter poetry, whose performance function is often explicitly to guide or advise its audience. Yet moralizing strategies are found in poetry whose aim is not simply to tell its audience how to live their lives, and a core aim of the conference on which this volume is based was to explore ways in which early Greek poetry uses implicit moralizing within a broader poetic framework. In other words, we are interested in exploring how moralizing is embedded in poetry whose overt goal appears to be something different (including, for example, entertainment, storytelling, or the expression of blame). The term “moralizing” may also imply a straightforward lesson for the audience, yet early Greek poetry often complicates any such “message” even as it gives it, and a further aim of the collection is to think about the status of the moral advice embedded in the performance. To what extent is direct advice questioned or undermined? How far can the audience trust the narrator and his or her perspective?

The articles in this collection address this question from different perspectives, and using different texts, but coalesce around a group of core themes and questions. One area of particular interest is the difference between explicit and implicit moralizing, and how the advice given by the two can be reconciled. Another overarching theme is the relationship between moralizing in lyric and how it is used in Homer and Hesiod. Lyric poetry (including elegy and iambus) frequently positions itself as in dialogue with the epic tradition, and borrows from and recasts epic motifs for its own purposes. Yet the performance context and imagined audience of lyric may differ from those of epic, and the strategies adopted by the poets vary accordingly. Many of the articles discuss beast fable and animal imagery, contesting the commonly-held idea (first proposed by Karl Meuli) that a fable does not carry a universal truth but rather a specific one to suit the context. Finally, questions of persona and poetic biography, and of the audience and performance context, play an important role in understanding how morality is disseminated and received.

Item Type: Edited Book
Copyright Holders: 2018 University of Toronto Press
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Philip Leverhulme PrizePLP-2015-253LEVERHULME The Leverhulme Trust
Mouseion JournalNot SetNot Set
Extra Information: E-ISSN: 1913-5416
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Cultures > Classical Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Cultures
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Item ID: 53103
Depositing User: Laura Swift
Date Deposited: 12 Feb 2018 10:02
Last Modified: 26 Jun 2018 14:11
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/53103
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU