Umney, Darren and Lloyd, Peter
(2018).
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.008 |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
Using the naturally-occurring data of official UK Parliamentary transcripts for the development of a new high speed rail project, this paper takes one characteristic of the design process, the use of precedent, to explore how problems and solutions are framed during discussion. In contrast to accounts of reframing that describe one big insight changing the design process we show how one particular precedent allows a series of attempts at reframing to take place in discussion. We conclude by arguing that precedents enable a diffusion of semi-objective meaning in discussion, similar to a prototype in a more conventional design process. This contrasts with other types of discourse elements, such as storytelling, that function through the subjective accumulation of meaning.
| Item Type: | Journal Item |
|---|---|
| Copyright Holders: | 2017 Elsevier Ltd. |
| ISSN: | 0142-694X |
| Keywords: | design process; design precedents; framing; discourse analysis; legislation |
| Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) |
| Related URLs: | |
| Item ID: | 52764 |
| Depositing User: | Darren Umney |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Jan 2018 14:29 |
| Last Modified: | 02 May 2018 14:37 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/52764 |
| Share this page: |     |
Metrics
Altmetrics from Altmetric | Citations from Dimensions |
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)