The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Why didn't prisoner rights come home?

Scott, David (2010). Why didn't prisoner rights come home? Criminal Justice Matters, 82(1) pp. 36–37.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2010.525937
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) received royal assent on 9 November 1998 and came into force ten years ago on 2 October 2000. The government rhetoric surrounding the introduction of the HRA included a commitment to ‘bring rights home’ and develop a ‘rights culture’ for the benefit of all people, including prisoners. Yet in terms of providing an impetus for a culture of rights in state institutions such as the prison, the HRA has proved to be somewhat of a damp squib. When we ask the question ‘why didn’t prisoner rights come home’ at least part of the answer can found through the recognition that from the start the HRA was shackled within a wider context of responsibilisation and minimalism. Evidence of its historically restrictive interpretation by the Prison Service can be indentified in two main ways: (1)assessment of existing policies and the level of training available prior to implementation and (2) the reassuring messages sent to staff via official discourse.

Item Type: Journal Item
ISSN: 0962-7251
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Item ID: 51599
Depositing User: David Scott
Date Deposited: 27 Oct 2017 14:55
Last Modified: 06 Aug 2019 08:51
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/51599
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU