The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

What does a "good" essay look like? Rainbow diagrams representing essay quality

Whitelock, D.; Twiner, A.; Richardson, J. T. E.; Field, D. and Pulman, S. (2018). What does a "good" essay look like? Rainbow diagrams representing essay quality. In: Technology Enhanced Assessment (TEA 2017). Communications in Computer and Information Science (Ras, E. and Guerrero Roldán, A. eds.), Springer, Cham, 829 pp. 1–12.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (224kB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97807-9_1
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper reports on an essay-writing study using a technical system that has been developed to generate automated feedback on academic essays. The system operates through the combination of a linguistic analysis engine, which processes the text in the essay, and a web application that uses the output of the linguistic analysis engine to generate the feedback. In this paper we focus on one particular visual representation produced by the system, namely “rainbow diagrams”. Using the concept of a reverse rainbow, diagrams are produced which visually represent how concepts are interlinked between the essay introduction (violet nodes) and conclusion (red nodes), and how concepts are linked and developed across the whole essay – thus a measure of how cohesive the essay is as a whole. Using a bank of rainbow diagrams produced from real essays, we rated the diagrams as belonging to high-, medium- or low-scoring essays according to their structure, and compared this rating to the actual marks awarded for the essays. On the basis of this we can conclude that a significant relationship exists between an essay’s rainbow diagram structure and the mark awarded. This finding has vast implications, as it is relatively easy to show users what the diagram for a “good” essay looks like. Users can then compare this to their own work before submission so that they can make necessary changes and so improve their essay’s structure, without concerns over plagiarism. Thus the system is a valuable tool that can be utilised across academic disciplines.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
ISBN: 3-319-97807-1, 978-3-319-97807-9
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Supportive Automated Feedback for Short Essay AnswersEP/J005959/1 & EP/J005231/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Keywords: Academic Essay Writing; Automated Feedback; Rainbow Diagrams; Visual Representation
Academic Unit/School: Other Departments > Research and Academic Strategy
Other Departments
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Health and Wellbeing PRA (Priority Research Area)
Item ID: 51538
Depositing User: Alison Twiner
Date Deposited: 06 Oct 2017 15:10
Last Modified: 21 Nov 2019 06:43
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/51538
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU