The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

The transatlantic agbiotech conflict: a policy problem and opportunity for EU regulatory policies

Levidow, Les (2006). The transatlantic agbiotech conflict: a policy problem and opportunity for EU regulatory policies. In: Falkner, Robert ed. The International politics of genetically modified food: diplomacy, trade and law. London: Palgrave, pp. 118–137.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (185kB)
URL: http://www.palgrave.com/products/Catalogue.aspx?is...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The US and EU have developed quite different frameworks for regulating agbiotech, but these were potentially compatible with transatlantic trade in GM products. How, then, did a trade conflict arise? This chapter challenges explanations centring on transatlantic regulatory divergence. Rather, the US-EU agbiotech conflict arose from contending transatlantic agendas, which have operated within and across the two jurisdictions. The analysis here extends insights from other academic accounts (Bernauer, 2003; Jasanoff, 2005; Toke, 2004; Isaac, 2002), while also disagreeing with some accounts. A transatlantic trade-liberalisation agenda set the context in which European protest could frame agbiotech as a dual threat of 'globalisation' and unknown risks. Greater controversy led to regulatory blockages and a trade conflict, which policy actors diagnosed in ways convenient for their own agendas. Promoting agbiotech, some politicians warned that EU regulatory delays or more stringent rules would be found illegal at the WTO. But this strategy backfired; instead it provided a vulnerable target for attack by 'anti-globalisation' activists. Citing US threats of a WTO case, opponents sought to delegitimise pro-agbiotech policies as a surrender to political and commercial pressures. From the late 1990s onwards, some European policymakers articulated a new problem ? how 'to restore public and market confidence' ? as an imperative for institutional reform. This problem-diagnosis helped to bypass earlier disagreements about the 'scientific' basis of regulatory criteria, thus facilitating more precautionary approaches to risk assessment and GM labelling. These changes accommodated key aspects of the 'consumer rights' agenda, thus potentially establishing a stronger basis to legitimise EU decisions.

Item Type: Book Section
ISBN: 0-230-00125-4, 978-0-230-00125-1
Keywords: US-EU agbiotech conflict, GM food, WTO dispute, trade liberalisation, European Union agbiotech policy, precautionary approaches
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Development
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Research Group: Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 5073
Depositing User: Les Levidow
Date Deposited: 27 Jul 2006
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2019 22:08
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/5073
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU