Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Rogaten, Jekaterina; Whitelock, Denise and Rienties, Bart
(2016).

This is the latest version of this eprint.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57744-9
Abstract
Over the last 30 years a range of assessment strategies have been developed aiming to effectively capture students’ learning in Higher Education and one such strategy is measuring students’ learning gains. The main goal of this study was to examine whether academic performance within modules is a valid proxy for estimating students’ learning gains. A total of 17,700 Science and Social Science students in 111 modules at the Open University UK were included in our three-level linear growth-curve model. Results indicated that for students studying in Science disciplines modules, module accounted for 33% of variance in students’ initial achievements, and 26% of variance in subsequent learning gains, whereas for students studying in Social Science disciplines modules, module accounted for 6% of variance in initial achievements, and 19% or variance in subsequent learning gains. The importance of the nature of the consistent, high quality assessments in predicting learning gains is discussed.
Viewing alternatives
Available Versions of this Item
-
Assessing learning gains. (deposited 22 Nov 2016 10:08)
- Assessing learning gains. (deposited 05 Jul 2017 13:29) [Currently Displayed]
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 49985
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- ISBN
- 3-319-57743-3, 978-3-319-57743-2
- ISSN
- 1865-0929
- Keywords
- learning gains; grades; assessment; multilevel modelling; Higher Education
- Academic Unit or School
- Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
- Research Group
- OpenSpace Research Centre (OSRC)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
- Related URLs
- Depositing User
- Jekaterina Rogaten