The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Using tests of false belief with children with autism: How valid and reliable are they?

Grant, Cathy M.; Grayson, Andy and Boucher, Jill (2001). Using tests of false belief with children with autism: How valid and reliable are they? Autism, 5(2) pp. 135–145.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361301005002004
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Twenty-two children with autism were given four tests of false belief understanding: the Sally-Anne task, two variants of the deceptive box task, and the three boxes task. The overall consistency of the children's performance was high, 77 percent of the participants either passing or failing all of the tasks. The convergent validity (across-task consistency) of the deceptive box and the three boxes paradigms was high, and the convergent validity of the three boxes and Sally-Anne tasks was also acceptable. However, a weaker level of convergent validity was found for the deceptive box and Sally-Anne tasks, suggesting that these paradigms test slightly different aspects of cognition. The reliability (within-child consistency) of the children's performances across two versions of the deceptive box task was high. These findings are discussed in terms of their practical implications for practitioners and researchers.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1362-3613
Keywords: autism; false belief; reliability; theory of mind; validity
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Childhood, Development and Learning
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 499
Depositing User: Users 12 not found.
Date Deposited: 25 May 2006
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2010 19:44
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/499
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk