Leigh, Andrew Philip; Wermelinger, Michel and Zisman, Andrea
(2017).
|
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (260kB) | Preview |
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
|---|
Abstract
Our motivation is to determine whether risks such as im- plementation error-proneness can be isolated into three types of con- tainers at design time. This paper identifies several container candidates in other research that fit the risk container concept. Two industrial case studies were used to determine which of three container types tested is most effective at isolating and predicting at design time the risk of im- plementation error-proneness. We found that Design Rule Containers were more effective than Use Case and Resource Containers.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item |
|---|---|
| Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications |
| Research Group: | Centre for Research in Computing (CRC) |
| Item ID: | 49874 |
| Depositing User: | Andrew Philip Leigh |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Jul 2017 12:51 |
| Last Modified: | 02 May 2018 14:30 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/49874 |
| Share this page: |     |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)