The Open UniversitySkip to content

Student learning and the menstrual cycle: Myths and realities

Richardson, John T. E. (1988). Student learning and the menstrual cycle: Myths and realities. Studies in Higher Education, 13(3) pp. 303–314.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


Female students are rapidly approaching equal representation in higher education at the level of first-degree courses. Most of these women are regularly affected by the cyclical process of ovulation and menstruation. It is often assumed that female students show variations in intellectual performance through the menstrual cycle, and women themselves report poor performance during the premenstrual and menstrual phases of the cycle. In principle, this would have implications for both assessment and tutoring procedures in institutions of higher education. However, the available research evidence indicates that the process of menstruation has no effect at all upon academic performance when measured by quantitative tests or examinations, and that subjective complaints of paramenstrual dysfunction originate in socially mediated beliefs rather than in any objective impairment. This itself has a number of important consequences for institutions of higher education and for research into student learning.

Item Type: Journal Item
ISSN: 0307-5079
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 49794
Depositing User: John T. E. Richardson
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2017 12:35
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 10:52
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU