Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Kaposi, David
(2017).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1872471X-12341297
Abstract
This article examines the significance of the private-public exchange of letters between Gershom Scholem and Hannah Arendt in the wake of the Eichmann trial. Using rhetorical analysis, it considers the respective arguments concerning Jewish responsibility, the incompatible political-moral frameworks offered to underpin such judgments, and the extreme identities the correspondents construct for each other. In doing so, it identifies the ultimate significance of the exchange with the total breakdown of discourse it symbolically resulted in—in other words, with the consensus pertaining to the Holocaust leading to a complete incommensurability of the respective political-moral positions. Such a state of affairs is finally accounted for, paradoxically, in terms of the far-reaching agreement. between Arendt and Scholem, reaching beyond politics and even identity: the total inescapability of Jewishness.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 49315
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1025-9996
- Keywords
- Jewish identity; Holocaust; Judaism; secularism; Hannah Arendt; Gershom Scholem; rhetorical analysis
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Depositing User
- David Kaposi