Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Gunton, Richard M.; van Asperen, Eline; Basden, Andrew; Bookless, David; Araya, Yoseph; Hanson, David R.; Goddard, Mark A.; Otieno, George and Jones, Gareth O.
(2017).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.01.002
Abstract
The ecosystem services framework (ESF) is advantageous and widely used for itemising and quantifying ways in which humans benefit from natural places. However, it suffers from two important problems: (i) incoherence of definitions and (ii) a narrow approach to valuation, inadequate to represent the full range of human motives for conservation and the diverse interests of different stakeholders. These shortcomings can lead to a range of problems including double-counting, blind spots and unintended consequences. Here we propose an ecosystem valuing framework (EVF) as a broader and more rigorous way to deliver the benefits currently sought from the ESF, without the conceptual problems.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 48246
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0169-5347
- Project Funding Details
-
Funded Project Name Project ID Funding Body Not Set Not Set Marsh Christian Trust Not Set Not Set West Yorkshire School of Christian Studies - Keywords
- aspectual analysis; ecological; cognitive; communal; ideological; multi-criterion assessment; natural capital; value theory
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Depositing User
- Yoseph Araya