Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Twining, Peter; Heller, Rachelle S.; Nussbaum, Miguel and Tsai, Chin-Chung
(2017).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002
Abstract
This paper sets out to address the problem of the imbalance between the number of quantitative and qualitative articles published in highly ranked research journals, by providing guidelines for the design, implementation and reporting of qualitative research. Clarification is provided of key terms (such as quantitative and qualitative) and the interrelationships between them. The relative risks and benefits of using guidelines for qualitative research are considered, and the importance of using any such guidelines flexibly is highlighted. The proposed guidelines are based on a synthesis of existing guidelines and syntheses of guidelines from a range of fields.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 48027
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0360-1315
- Keywords
- qualitative; quantitative; research; guidelines; theoretical stance; methods
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Education, Childhood, Youth and Sport > Education
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Education, Childhood, Youth and Sport
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) - Research Group
-
Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Education Futures - Copyright Holders
- © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
- Depositing User
- Peter Twining