The Open UniversitySkip to content

The impact of ditch blocking on the hydrological functioning of blanket peatlands

Holden, Joseph; Green, Sophie M.; Baird, Andy J.; Grayson, Richard P.; Dooling, Gemma P.; Chapman, Pippa J.; Evans, Christopher D.; Peacock, Mike and Swindles, Graeme (2017). The impact of ditch blocking on the hydrological functioning of blanket peatlands. Hydrological Processes, 31(3) pp. 525–539.

Full text available as:
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (13MB) | Preview
PDF (Not Set) (Cover Page conversion from application/pdf to application/pdf) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (13MB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


Ditch blocking in blanket peatlands is common as part of peatland restoration. The effects of ditch-blocking on flow regimes and nearby water tables were examined in a field trial. After an initial six month monitoring period, eight ditches had peat dams installed 10 m apart along their entire length (dammed), four of these ditches were also partially infilled through bank reprofiling (reprofiled). Four ditches were left open with no dams or reprofiling (open). These 12 ditches and the surrounding peat were monitored for a further 4 years. An initial five-fold reduction in discharge occurred in the dammed and the reprofiled ditches with the displaced water being diverted to overland flow and pathways away from the ditches. However, there was a gradual change over time in ditch flow regime in subsequent years, with the overall volume of water leaving the dammed and the reprofiled ditches increasing per unit of rainfall to around twice that which occurred in the first year after blocking. Hence monitoring for greater than one year is important for understanding hydrological impacts of peatland restoration. Overland flow and flow in the upper ~4 cm of peat was common and occurred in the inter-ditch areas for over half of the time after ditch blocking. There was strong evidence that topographic boundaries of small ditch catchments, despite being defined using a high-resolution LiDAR-based terrain model, were not always equivalent to actual catchment areas. Hence caution is needed when upscaling area-based fluxes, such as aquatic carbon fluxes, from smaller scale studies including those using ditches and small streams. The effect of ditch blocking on local water tables was spatially highly variable but small overall (time-weighted mean effect < 2 cm). Practitioners seeking to raise water tables through peatland restoration should first be informed either by prior measurement of water tables or by spatial modelling to show whether the peatland already has shallow water tables or whether there are locations which could potentially undergo large water-table recoveries.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN: 1099-1085
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Not SetNot SetDEFRA (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs)
Keywords: Discharge; ditches; drainage; restoration; water tables; wetland
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Item ID: 47896
Depositing User: Michael Peacock
Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2016 14:13
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2019 14:39
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU