The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

How external and internal resources influence user action: the case of infusion devices

Iacovides, Ioanna; Blandford, Ann; Cox, Anna and Back, Jonathan (2016). How external and internal resources influence user action: the case of infusion devices. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18(4) pp. 793–805.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (653kB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0392-0
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Human error can have potentially devastating consequences in contexts such as healthcare, but there is a rarely a simple dichotomy between errors and correct behaviour. Furthermore, there has been little consideration of how the activities of users (erroneous and otherwise) relate to the conceptual fit between user and device, despite the fact that healthcare technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent and complex. In this article, we present a study in which nurses’ conceptions of infusion device practice were elicited to identify misfits. By focusing on key concepts that users work with when setting up infusions and the extent to which the system supports them, our analysis highlights how actions are influenced by the different resources available to users including: the device itself; supporting artefacts; the conceptual understanding of the user; and the community of practice the user is part of. The findings reveal the ways in which users are resourceful in their day-to-day activities and also suggest potential vulnerabilities within the wider system that could threaten patient safety. Our approach is able to make previously under-explored aspects of practice visible, thus enabling insight into how users act and why.

Item Type: Article
Copyright Holders: 2016 The Authors
ISSN: 1435-5566
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
CHI+MEDEP/G059063/ 1EPSRC
Keywords: human error; conceptual fit; healthcare; qualitative research
Academic Unit/School: Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning Teaching and Innovation (LTI)
Item ID: 47464
Depositing User: Ioanna Iacovides
Date Deposited: 28 Sep 2016 13:29
Last Modified: 04 Apr 2017 16:20
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/47464
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

▼ Automated document suggestions from open access sources

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk