The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Testing the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a 'decision navigation' intervention for early stage prostate cancer patients in Scotland - A randomised controlled trial

Hacking, Belinda; Wallace, Louise; Scott, Sarah; Kosmala-Anderson, Joanna; Belkora, Jeffrey and McNeill, Alan (2013). Testing the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a 'decision navigation' intervention for early stage prostate cancer patients in Scotland - A randomised controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology, 22(5) pp. 1017–1024.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3093
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Objective
Does decision navigation (DN) increase prostate cancer patients' confidence and certainty in treatment decisions, while reducing regret associated with the decisions made?

Methods
Two hundred eighty-nine newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients were eligible. 123 consented and were randomised to usual care (n = 60) or navigation (n = 63).

The intervention involved a 'navigator' guiding the patient in creating a personal question list for a consultation and providing a CD and typed summary of the consultation to patients, the general practitioner and physician.

The primary outcome was decisional self efficacy. Secondary outcomes included decisional conflict (DCS) and decisional regret (RS). Measures of mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and adjustment (Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale) were included to detect potential adverse effects of the intervention.

Results
ANOVA showed a main effect for the group (F = 7.161, df 1, p = 0.009). Post hoc comparisons showed significantly higher decisional self efficacy in the navigated patients post-consultation and 6 months later. Decisional conflict was lower for navigated patients initially (t = 2.005, df = 105, p = 0.047), not at follow-up (t = 1.969, df = 109, p = 0.052). Regret scores were significantly lower in the navigation group compared to the controls 6 months later (t = -2.130, df = 100, p = 0.036). There was no impact of the intervention on mood or adjustment.

Conclusion
Compared to control patients, navigated patients were more confident in making decisions about cancer treatment, were more certain they had made the right decision after the consultation and had less regret about their decision 6 months later. Decision navigation was feasible, acceptable and effective for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients in Scotland.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN: 1099-1611
Keywords: cancer; oncology; prostate; decision aid; self efficacy
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Item ID: 46558
Depositing User: Louise Wallace
Date Deposited: 13 Jun 2016 09:50
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 10:41
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/46558
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU