Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Carter, Simon and Michael, Mike
(2003).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00333
Abstract
This paper is an analysis of educational materials produced by the United Kingdom’s Medical Research Council (MRC). While the MRC’s Research Updates are designed to be used in the classroom, interviews with MRC contributors to the Updates and with teachers and students show that their function is complex. Drawing on these data, we point to three facets of biomedical texts that have been neglected. First, we note that these texts are meant to influence only a proportion of their target audience. Their impact is to set up a ‘resonance’ in this proportion of students, a resonance that will at some point in the future materialise as a choice to pursue a career in biomedical research. This is our second observation: that texts are designed to have a latent effect. These texts also address another audience – government bodies who demand that the MRC engage in educational and public understanding of science activities. As such, and this is our third observation, scientific texts can signify laterally, not to readers directly engaged with them, but to observers whose concern is with their trajectory.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 4585
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1467-9566
- Keywords
- science and technology studies; sociology of science; public understanding of science; Medical Research Council; biomedical education; texts
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Sociology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Depositing User
- Users 13 not found.