The Open UniversitySkip to content

Comparing Urban Road Pricing Implementation and Management Strategies from the UK and Norway

Ieromonachou, Petros; Potter, Stephen and Warren, James (2005). Comparing Urban Road Pricing Implementation and Management Strategies from the UK and Norway. In: PIARC Seminar on Road Pricing with emphasis on Financing, Regulation and Equity, 11-13 Apr 2005, Cancun, Mexico.

Full text available as:
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) | Preview
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


Traditional policies of road expansion involved a relatively simple system of actors and processes around which expertise, knowledge, and skills had built up over many decades. Some of the more radical Travel Demand Management (TDM) measures, including urban road pricing policies, involve a complicated set of institutions, processes, people and procedures. Road pricing schemes often get held up or discarded due to controversy, disagreements, unanticipated problems, and a whole host of other delaying factors. If they ever get implemented, they tend to be diluted and consequently less effective.
The paper uses an adaptation of Strategic Niche Management (SNM) to analyse road user charging case studies in the UK and Norway. SNM has previously been used to provide guidelines on the implementation of radical transport technologies (Hoogma et al., 2002). For this paper, it is modified to cover a socio-technical approach (Ieromonachou et al., 2004). A systems map is created of stakeholders involved in each road user charging scheme and of the relationships between them. A detailed SNM analysis is presented of the road user charging schemes in Bergen, Oslo, Durham and London. From this, key strategic aspects are identified, together with the processes involved in their management. These include:
• The project champion
• The role of stakeholders and users networks
• The motivations and expectations of stakeholders and users
• The change in perceptions associated with acceptance
Comparison between the four cases shows the different approaches of each country regarding the implementation and ‘marketing’ of the policies. This includes the purpose for introducing the policies, the involvement of users in the planning process and, the use of
revenues for providing alternative transport modes or financing road infrastructure.
The results from this research suggest that the use of SNM for policy analysis can help identify critical information, processes and actors in the planning, introduction and implementation of behavioural change transport policies, the barriers faced during implementation (social, political, institutional, financial), and the different information needs
for each step in the process.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Keywords: SNM; congestion charging; Durham; Oslo; Bergen; London; strategic niche management
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Research Group: Design and Innovation
Related URLs:
Item ID: 45396
Depositing User: James Warren
Date Deposited: 24 Feb 2016 14:36
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 11:17
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU