The Open UniversitySkip to content

LAK Failathon

Clow, Doug; Ferguson, Rebecca; Macfadyen, Leah; Prinsloo, Paul and Slade, Sharon (2016). LAK Failathon. In: LAK '16: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, ACM, New York pp. 509–511.

Full text available as:
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (150kB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


As in many fields, most papers in the learning analytics literature report success or, at least, read as if they are reporting success. This is almost certainly not because learning analytics research and activity are always successful. Generally, we report our successes widely, but keep our failures to ourselves. As Bismarck is alleged to have said: it is wise to learn from the mistakes of others. This workshop offers an opportunity for researchers and practitioners to share their failures in a lower-stakes environment, to help them learn from each other’s mistakes.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Copyright Holders: 2016 ACM
ISBN: 1-4503-4190-X, 978-1-4503-4190-5
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
LACE project619424European Commission Seventh Framework Programme
Extra Information: The full text of the version submitted to ORO does not have the final author listed.
Keywords: failure; publication bias; positive results; negative results
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 45316
Depositing User: Rebecca Ferguson
Date Deposited: 15 Feb 2016 10:35
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 21:53
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU