The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Evaluative Language and Its Solidarity-Building Role on TED.com: An Appraisal and Corpus Analysis

Drasovean, Anda and Tagg, Caroline (2015). Evaluative Language and Its Solidarity-Building Role on TED.com: An Appraisal and Corpus Analysis. Language@Internet, 12, article no. 1.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (944kB) | Preview
URL: http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2015/dr...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Language is a key resource in the formation of online communities, which are in turn central to an understanding of contemporary social relations. This study looks at TED.com, an educational video-hosting platform with few in-built community-building functionalities, to explore the potential for users to affiliate through their language choices. Grounded in Systemic Functional Linguistics, the study uses the Appraisal framework, extended using corpus linguistic methods, in order to analyse users’ reactions to TED videos. The study shows that online participants use evaluative language to align with certain ideas and, based on these affinities, form affiliations characterized by sociability and solidarity. These affiliations raise important questions about the conception of ‘community’ in twenty-first century society.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2015 The Authors
ISSN: 1860-2029
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Languages and Applied Linguistics
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS)
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Language & Literacies
Health and Wellbeing PRA (Priority Research Area)
Item ID: 44604
Depositing User: Caroline Tagg
Date Deposited: 13 Oct 2015 10:26
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2017 11:00
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/44604
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk