The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Keywords of written reflection - a comparison between reflective and descriptive datasets

Ullmann, Thomas Daniel (2015). Keywords of written reflection - a comparison between reflective and descriptive datasets. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology Enhanced Learning (Kravcik, Milos; Mikroyannidis, Alexander; Pammer, Viktoria; Prilla, Michael and Ullmann, Thomas Daniel eds.), pp. 83–96.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (175kB) | Preview
URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1465/paper8.pdf
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study investigates reflection keywords by contrasting two datasets, one of reflective sentences and another of descriptive sentences. The log-likelihood statistic reveals several reflection keywords that are discussed in the context of a model for reflective writing. These keywords are seen as a useful building block for tools that can automatically analyse reflection in texts.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Copyright Holders: 2015 Thomas Daniel Ullmann
ISSN: 1613-0073
Extra Information: In conjunction with the 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World (EC-TEL 2015)
Keywords: reflection detection; thinking skills analytics; log-likelihood; keyword; key word
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Item ID: 44590
Depositing User: Thomas Ullmann
Date Deposited: 12 Oct 2015 08:49
Last Modified: 08 Dec 2018 04:22
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/44590
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU