The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Aesthetic concepts and aesthetic experience

Matravers, Derek (1996). Aesthetic concepts and aesthetic experience. British Journal of Aesthetics, 36(3) pp. 265–277.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.265
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this paper I want to return to some well-worn ideas; specifically, the attempt to show that there is a distinctive subject-matter of the aesthetic via consideration of the difference between aesthetic and non-aesthetic concepts. The classic exposition of this distinction is Frank Sibley's 'Aesthetic Concepts'. Sibley claimed that, given a set of relevant terms, there will be widespread non-collusive agreement as to which are aesthetic and which non-aesthetic. Non-aesthetic terms include 'red, noisy, brackish, clammy, square, docile, curved, evanescent, intelligent, faithful, derelict, tardy, freakish'. Aesthetic terms include 'unified, lifeless, serene, sombre, dynamic, powerful, vivid, delicate, moving, trite, sentimental, tragic'. Further examples have been given by other philosophers working in the field. Given the widespread agreement, I shall assume there is a distinction of some sort whose nature is open to be discussed.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 1996 Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1468-2842
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Philosophy
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Item ID: 43690
Depositing User: Derek Matravers
Date Deposited: 16 Jul 2015 09:50
Last Modified: 06 Aug 2019 08:47
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/43690
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU