The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Comparing functional analysis methods for product dissection tasks

Booth, Joran W.; Reid, Tahira; Eckert, Claudia and Ramani, Karthik (2015). Comparing functional analysis methods for product dissection tasks. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(8), article no. 081101.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030232
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to begin to explore which function identification methods work best for specific design tasks. We use a 3-level within-subject study (n=78) to compare three strategies for identifying functions: energy-flow, top-down, and enumeration. These are tested in a product dissection task with student engineers who have minimal prior experience. Participants were asked to dissect a hair dryer, power drill, and toy dart gun and generate function trees to describe how these work. The function trees were evaluated with several metrics including the total number of functions generated, the number of syntactical errors, and the number of unique (relevant and non-redundant) functions. We found no statistical, practical, or qualitative difference between the trees produced for each method. We also found some generalized findings through surveys that the most difficult aspects of using functional decomposition include identifying functions, choosing function verbs, and drawing the diagram. Together, this may also mean that for novice engineers, simpler methods, such as enumeration, should be taught prior to more complicated methods so students can grasp core concepts such as identifying functions and structuring function diagrams.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2015 by ASME
ISSN: 1528-9001
Extra Information: 10 pp.
Keywords: flow (dynamics); engineers; electric drills; engineering students; design; errors; functional analysis; students
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: International Development & Inclusive Innovation
Design and Innovation
Item ID: 42688
Depositing User: Claudia Eckert
Date Deposited: 08 May 2015 10:06
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2017 11:23
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/42688
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU