The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Utilitarian bioethics?: market fetishism in the GM crops debate

Levidow, Les (2001). Utilitarian bioethics?: market fetishism in the GM crops debate. New Genetics and Society, 20(1) pp. 75–84.

URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/cng...
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14636770123667
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the early debate over agricultural biotechnology, the term 'risk' was used to challenge the legitimacy and problem-definitions of the dominant R&D priorities. In response, state procedures were designed to fragment the issues through separate administrative procedures for safety and bioethics. With the advent of mass protest and intense public debate, 'bioethics' has again been contested, now more clearly linked with globalization and development issues. Even within ethics discourse, utilitarian concepts are used to emphasize tangible product benefits, which are defined according to particular socio-economic assumptions. These assume that food insecurity results from inefficient agricultural methods and deficient inputs. More fundamentally, such favourable arguments idealize 'the market' as a quasi-natural force which somehow judges and distributes benefits of products. This pervasive utilitarian ideology is reinforced by the report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

As investors devise political-commercial strategies for commoditizing plant resources and intensifying global competition among producers, these forces are fetishized as 'the market', as if given by the nature of things. At the same time, when consumers demand different market choices, their rationality is questioned. This response extends the original 'utilitarian' ideology -- by naturalizing the commodization process, while disparaging any resistance as illegitimate interference with progress. In this form, utilitarian bioethics delinks R&D priorities from the relevant forces -- which shape the 'market demand', subordinate resource use to market relations, and marginalize practices outside such relations.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1463-6778
Keywords: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; agbiotech; markets; technological efficiency; utilitarianism
Academic Unit/Department: Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Engineering & Innovation
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 4212
Depositing User: Les Levidow
Date Deposited: 04 Jul 2006
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2010 19:51
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/4212
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk