The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Credibility lost: attempting to reclaim an expert identity in an HR professional context

Pritchard, Katrina and Fear, William James (2015). Credibility lost: attempting to reclaim an expert identity in an HR professional context. Human Resource Management Journal, 25 pp. 343–363.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (423kB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12068
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Professional insecurity is a long standing concern within Human Resources (HR), with claims to expertise seen as critical to credibility. Considering HR as an epistemic community and drawing on the identity work literature we examine an identity threat to, and subsequent response by, a training and development (T&D) team. Based on ethnographic exposure to their practice, we explore how team members experience the threat and follow their attempts to re-establish their position in the local epistemic community, the HR department. We examine both individual and collective identity work, considering how both the identity threat and subsequent responses are embedded within training and development and HR practice more broadly. Through this analysis we offer academic insight on the nature of HR practice and the construction of claims to expertise.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN: 1748-8583
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
ESRC funded PhDPTA-0302004-00095ESRC
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 41878
Depositing User: Katrina Pritchard
Date Deposited: 22 Jan 2015 10:43
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 13:54
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/41878
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU