Petre, Marian and Wilson, Greg
(2014).
|
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (87kB) | Preview |
| URL: | http://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.5648v2.pdf |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
We describe two pilot studies of code review by and for scientists. Our principal findings are that scien- tists are enthusiastic, but need to be shown code re- view in action, and that just-in-time review of small code changes is more likely to succeed than large-scale end-of-work reviews.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item |
|---|---|
| Copyright Holders: | 2014 The Authors |
| Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) |
| Research Group: | Centre for Research in Computing (CRC) |
| Related URLs: | |
| Item ID: | 41543 |
| Depositing User: | Marian Petre |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Dec 2014 12:48 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Dec 2018 23:01 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/41543 |
| Share this page: |     |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)