The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Study of creep cavitation in a stainless steel weldment using small angle neutron scattering and scanning electron microscopy

Jazaeri, H.; Bouchard, P. J.; Hutchings, M. T. and Lindner, P. (2014). Study of creep cavitation in a stainless steel weldment using small angle neutron scattering and scanning electron microscopy. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference, Materials and Fabrication, article no. PVP2014-28641.

URL: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/...
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2014-28641
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Strain-relief cracking, also referred to as reheat cracking, is a generic creep failure mode that has been observed in many welded stainless steel structures operating at high temperatures in UK nuclear power plant. One of the challenges currently faced by nuclear utility EDF Energy is the need to predict, with high certainty, the life-time of ageing engineering plant operating in the creep regime.

A study of creep cavities near a reheat crack, ∼28 mm long, in an AISI Type 316H austenitic stainless steel header is reported. The cracked component was removed after 65,000 hours operation at a mean temperature of 525°C in a nuclear power plant. Creep cavities in the vicinity of the crack are observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and found to be mainly surrounding inter-granular carbides. Optimized metallographic and image analysis procedures are used to quantify the size and area fraction of creep cavities as a function of distance from the crack along a line normal to the crack face. Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) is used to quantify creep cavitation, averaged over a large gauge volume, ∼20 mm3, at similar positions normal to the crack line. A systematic increase in the true fractional size distribution of cavities is observed approaching the crack. The cavity size distribution peaks between 100–300 nm diameter and this correlates closely with the quantitative metallography results of cavities in this sample. SANS has the advantage of being non-destructive and also the examined volume is several mm3, against an area of hundreds of μm2 in the case of SEM, therefore giving more statistically significant results. However the two techniques are complementary, as the detailed microscopic information from SEM is required to interpret the SANS data.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Copyright Holders: 2014 by ASME
ISBN: 0-7918-4603-2, 978-0-7918-4603-2
Keywords: creep; cavitation; scanning electron microscopy; neutron diffraction; stainless steel
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Item ID: 41460
Depositing User: Hedieh Jazaeri
Date Deposited: 03 Dec 2014 14:54
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2016 16:09
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/41460
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU