Trudgill, S.T.; Viles, H.A.; Inkpen, R.; Moses, C.; Gosling, W.; Yates, T.; Collier, P.; Smith, D.I. and Cook, R.U.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1002/esp.260|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Microerosion meter (MEM) measurements of the surface height of the balustrade of St Paul’s Cathedral, London, have been repeated in the year 2000 following earlier measurements in 1980, 1981, 1985 and 1990. Methodological sources of error mean that while the measurements were made to 0Ð0001 mm, the data are reliable to two decimal places. There was a reduction in the mean erosion rate on horizontal sites from 0Ð045 mm a1 in the period 1980–1990 to 0Ð025 mm a1 in 1990–2000. Decreases in atmospheric SO2 levels from 20–25 ppb in 1980–1982 to around 10 ppb in 1990–2000, offer a causal explanation. The surface topography evolved more erratically in 1990–2000 than before, with much, but not all, of the more microelevated areas showing greater, and often more variable erosion. There are also indications of less erosion and more surface rises in low-lying microareas on horizontal sites which is interpreted as possible deposition and/or microfloral growth in wetter depressions, the pattern being largely absent on a well drained vertical site.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||limestone erosion; St Paul’s Cathedral; weathering of building stone|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Science > Environment, Earth and Ecosystems
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||OpenSpace Research Centre (OSRC)
Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)
|Depositing User:||William Gosling|
|Date Deposited:||04 Jul 2006|
|Last Modified:||14 Jan 2016 15:59|
|Share this page:|