The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment: a literature review

Richardson, John T. E. (2015). Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment: a literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3) pp. 439–455.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.919628
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the UK and other countries, the use of end-of-module assessment by coursework in higher education has increased over the last 40 years. This has been justified by various pedagogical arguments. In addition, students themselves prefer to be assessed either by coursework alone or by a mixture of coursework and examinations than by examinations alone. Assessment by coursework alone or by a mixture of coursework and examinations tends to yield higher marks than assessment by examinations alone. The increased adoption of assessment by coursework has contributed to an increase over time in the marks on individual modules and in the proportion of good degrees across entire programmes. Assessment by coursework appears to attenuate the negative effect of class size on student attainment. The difference between coursework marks and examination marks tends to be greater in some disciplines than others, but it appears to be similar in men and women and in students from different ethnic groups. Collusion, plagiarism and personation (especially ‘contract cheating’ through the use of bespoke essays) are potential problems with coursework assessment. Nevertheless, the increased use of assessment by coursework has generally been seen as uncontentious, with only isolated voices expressing concerns regarding possible risks to academic standards.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2014 Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1469-297X
Extra Information: This article is reprinted in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (2016) Malloch, Margaret, Cairns, Len and O'Connor, Bridget N. (eds.) Sage Library of Educational Thought and Practice.
Keywords: coursework; degree class; ethnicity; examinations; gender
Academic Unit/School: Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 40318
Depositing User: John T. E. Richardson
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2014 08:16
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 10:23
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/40318
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU