The Open UniversitySkip to content

“Victims” versus “offenders” in British political discourse: the construction of a false dichotomy

Drake, Deborah H. and Henley, Andrew J. (2014). “Victims” versus “offenders” in British political discourse: the construction of a false dichotomy. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 53(2) pp. 141–157.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This article evaluates the contemporary discursive status of victims and people convicted of criminal offences. The rhetoric used by British politicians to convey the meaning of ‘rights’ is explored within media output, parliamentary speech-making and other forms of political discourse. Our analysis details how victims’ rights are sometimes advocated for at the expense of ‘offenders’ ’ rights in public discourse. Examination of parliamentary debates illustrates that differentiating between ‘victims’ and ‘offenders’ elides consideration of more meaningful support for victims, worsens opportunities for the reintegration of ex-prisoners and constructs a false dichotomy between citizens who do not fall into mutually-exclusive categories.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2013 The Howard League and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN: 1468-2311
Keywords: human rights; prisoners; populist punitiveness; disenfranchisement
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > History, Religious Studies, Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: International Centre for Comparative Criminological Research (ICCCR)
Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC)
Item ID: 40067
Depositing User: Deborah Drake
Date Deposited: 02 May 2014 10:56
Last Modified: 04 Oct 2016 11:35
Share this page:


Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU