The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Reasonable diligence or unreasonable judicial expectations? The effect on lenders of section 32(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980

Pywell, Stephanie (2000). Reasonable diligence or unreasonable judicial expectations? The effect on lenders of section 32(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer pp. 261–267.

Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This casenote explores what a mortgage lender must do in order to be "reasonably diligent" when a borrower defaults. If the absence of reasonable diligence, there is a risk that a claim brought by the lender may be statute-barred.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2000 Not known
ISSN: 0010-8200
Keywords: fraud; limitations; mortgages; professional negligence; solicitors
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Law
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Item ID: 39665
Depositing User: Stephanie Pywell
Date Deposited: 07 Mar 2014 11:59
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 10:22
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/39665
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU