Earle, Rod
(2014).
|
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (395kB) | Preview |
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413515832 |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
Loic Waquant’s (2002) worry that as penal populations explode in the USA there has been a ‘curious eclipse’ in qualitative studies of confinement is, as Jewkes (2012) suggests, somewhat misplaced on the UK side of the Atlantic. Even so, as this special issue indicates, there are some occlusions in the accounts being presented, and opportunities to be developed to ‘do prison research differently’. In this article I explore some of the potentials, possibilities and problems afforded by insider research, research that draws from direct experience of penal confinement.
The basic issues of prison research are starkly posed in King’s (2000:298) remark that ‘[N]o amount of theorizing or reading in an office can substitute for the hands-on experience of spending your time in prison’. The issue I want to explore is whether, and how, ‘spending time’ is different from ‘serving time’ in the epistemological stakes of prison research. As Jewkes (2012) also points out prison ethnographers in the UK have offered rich and diverse accounts of penal interiors, and prisoners voices have been, for the most part, reported with sensitivity, creativity and insight (see for example, Leibling 1999, 2004, 2011; Crewe 2009; Drake 2012; Phillips 2012; Crewe and Bennett 2011). However, in the midst of this relatively flourishing qualitative research activity the voices and experiences of ex-prisoners as prison researchers is subdued, though there are signs this may be about to change (Aresti 2012; Earle 2011). In this article I want to critically examine some of the epistemological claims and potentials of insider research, its’ relations to ethnography and the relevance of advocacy groups, such as Convict Criminology.
| Item Type: | Journal Item | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copyright Holders: | Sage | ||||||
| ISSN: | 1552-7565 | ||||||
| Project Funding Details: |
|
||||||
| Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care > Health and Social Care Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) |
||||||
| Research Group: | Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC) | ||||||
| Item ID: | 39517 | ||||||
| Depositing User: | Rod Earle | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2014 09:11 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 11 Jun 2020 20:29 | ||||||
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/39517 | ||||||
| Share this page: |     |
Metrics
Altmetrics from Altmetric | Citations from Dimensions |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)