The Open UniversitySkip to content

Evaluating the performance of public services: introducing the evaluator's comparison framework

Dadd, Deneise (2013). Evaluating the performance of public services: introducing the evaluator's comparison framework. In: British Academy of Management (BAM) 2013 Conference, 10-12 Sep 2013, Liverpool, UK, British Academy of Management (BAM).

Full text available as:
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (3MB) | Preview
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


As public services come under more scrutiny, practitioners are evaluating more of their investments in human capital. But, faced with numerous evaluation approaches, how do they compare them? This paper presents The Evaluator's Comparison Framework (ECF), a useful tool for comparing the planning, implementation (including monitoring and evaluation), and reporting elements of a project/initiative. It also demonstrates the framework in use with a comparison of the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) and the abdi Recommended ROI approach. From this demonstration, the differences between these approaches can be seen, allowing evaluators to select the one more appropriate to their needs.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Copyright Holders: 2013 Dadd
ISBN: 0-9549608-6-6, 978-0-9549608-6-5
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Performance Measurement: Applying Return on Investment (ROI) to Human Capital InvestmentsNot Setabdi Ltd
Keywords: evaluator; evaluation approaches; log frame; logical framework approach; ROI approach
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 39464
Depositing User: Deneise Dadd
Date Deposited: 10 Feb 2014 09:29
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 22:01
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU