The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Mistaken identity and the precarious third party

Fletcher, Roland (2004). Mistaken identity and the precarious third party. Law Teacher, 38(3) pp. 372–386.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (266kB) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2004.9993163
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The decision in Shogun Finance Ltd v. Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371 dealt with the notion of mistaken identity and considered the rules of agency when dealing with the formation of a hire purchase contract. It is irresistible to question this decision and the application of the legal rules, dealing with mistaken identity, that were produced over a hundred years ago and to apply them in today's commercial environment. This article examines the basis of the decision and whether the application of the law has become distorted in its quest to apply an artificial formula to ascertain whether a contract is void or voidable.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2004 Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1943-0353
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Law
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 39367
Depositing User: Roland Fletcher
Date Deposited: 03 Feb 2014 15:43
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2018 15:00
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/39367
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU