The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

‘What retention’ means to me: the position of the adult learner in student retention

Rose-Adams, John and Hewitt, Lindsay (2012). ‘What retention’ means to me: the position of the adult learner in student retention. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 14 pp. 146–164.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (114kB) | Preview
URL: http://wpll-journal.metapress.com/content/v0rn8686...
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.14.S.146
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Studies of student retention and progression overwhelmingly appear adopt definitions that place the institution, rather than the student, at the centre. Retention is most often conceived in terms of linear and continuous progress between institutionally identified start and end points.

This paper reports on research that considered data from 38 in-depth interviews conducted with individuals who had characteristics often associated with non-traditional engagement in higher education who between 2006 and 2010 had studied an ‘Introduction to HE’ module at one distance higher education institution, some of whom had progressed to further study at that institution, some of whom had not. The research deployed a life histories approach to seek a finer grained understanding of how individuals conceptualise their own learning journey and experience, in order to reflect on institutional conceptions of student retention.

The findings highlight potential anomalies hidden within institutional retention rates – large proportions of the interview participants who were not ‘retained’ by the institution reported successful progression to and in other learning institutions and environments, both formal and informal. Nearly all described positive perspectives on lifelong learning which were either engendered or improved by the learning undertaken. This attests to the complexity of individuals’ lives and provides clear evidence that institution-centric definitions of retention and progression are insufficient to create truly meaningful understanding of successful individual learning journeys and experiences. It is argued that only through careful consideration of the lived experience of students and a re-conception of measures of retention, will we be able to offer real insight into improving student retention.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2012 The Authors
ISSN: 2045-2713
Extra Information: Special issue/Winter 2012-13: What Works? Student Retention and Success, Open University
Keywords: retention; adult, lifelong learning; lifewide learning; individual; student; widening participation; non-traditional student; formal; informal; non-formal
Academic Unit/School: Other Departments > Strategy Office
Other Departments
Other Departments > Other Departments
Item ID: 37544
Depositing User: John Rose-Adams
Date Deposited: 03 May 2013 09:04
Last Modified: 06 Oct 2016 01:40
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/37544
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk