The Open UniversitySkip to content

Synchrony and process: editing manuscript miscellanies

Gibson, Jonathan (2012). Synchrony and process: editing manuscript miscellanies. Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 (SEL), 52(1) pp. 85–100.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This essay argues that editors of informal early modern manuscript miscellanies should place greater emphasis on the discontinuities in miscellany construction. Manuscript miscellanies are often the products of discrete phases of composition, collection, and transcription, combining distinct thematic and generic sections in complex but analyzable ways, rather than authorially unified collections comparable to sonnet sequences. The argument is illustrated by an analysis of points at which Jean Klene’s Renaissance English Text Society edition of Anne Southwell’s miscellany (Folger Shakespeare MS V.b.198) elides textual discontinuity: at one point, for example, the edition fails to register the fact that a sheet has been bound in back to front. The essay concludes with some suggestions about ways in which future editions of manuscript miscellanies, both electronic and hard copy, might better reflect the complex structures of their copy texts.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2012 Johns Hopkins University Press
ISSN: 0039-3657
Keywords: editing; early modern manuscripts; bibliographical theory; Anne Southwell
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Humanities > English & Creative Writing
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Humanities
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Research Group: History of Books and Reading (HOBAR)
Item ID: 36884
Depositing User: Jonathan Gibson
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2013 11:03
Last Modified: 06 Aug 2019 08:44
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU