The Open UniversitySkip to content

Deference and essentialism in the categorization of chemical kinds

Braisby, Nicholas (2004). Deference and essentialism in the categorization of chemical kinds. In: Alterman, Richard and Kirsch, David eds. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Cognitive Science Society: July 31-August 2, 2003, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Volume 1. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 174–179.

Full text available as:
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (72kB)
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


Psychological essentialism has been subject to much debate. Yet a key implication – that people should defer to experts in categorizing natural kinds – has not been widely examined. Three experiments examine deference in the categorization of chemical kinds. The first establishes borderline cases used in the second and third. These latter show limited deference to experts, and some deference to non-experts. These data are consistent with a perspectival framework for concepts in which categorization is sometimes based on micro-structural properties and sometimes on appearance and function.

Item Type: Book Section
ISBN: 0-8058-4991-2, 978-0-8058-4991-2
Keywords: categorisation; concepts; deference; expertise
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Item ID: 3637
Depositing User: Nicholas Braisby
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2006
Last Modified: 15 May 2018 14:46
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU