The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Transcending the deregulation debate? regulation, risk, and the enforcement of health and safety law in the UK

Tombs, Steve and Whyte, David (2013). Transcending the deregulation debate? regulation, risk, and the enforcement of health and safety law in the UK. Regulation & Governance, 7(1) pp. 61–79.

Full text available as:
Full text not publicly available (Proof)
Due to publisher licensing restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01164.x
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper considers the context for the development of the concept of responsive regulation, namely the transcending of the deregulation debate. It argues that claims regarding responsive regulation when allied to risk-based rationales for enforcement can, in fact, allow a “deregulatory” momentum to develop. This argument is grounded with reference to a case study of the regulation of workplace health and safety in the UK, with a particular focus upon the period 2000–2010. The paper casts doubt on the relevance and robustness of the concept of responsive regulation. In a context that might have been fertile ground for developing genuinely responsive regulatory policy, empirically we find the development of policies that are better described as “regulatory degradation.” Thus we argue in this paper that, whatever the intentions of its proponents, there is a logical affinity between responsive regulation, and effective de-regulation, and that it is this affinity that has provided a convenient political rationale for the emergence of a neo-liberal regulatory settlement in the UK.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2012 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
ISSN: 1748-5991
Extra Information: First published online: 29 Oct 2012

Special issue: Twenty years of responsive regulation: an appreciation and appraisal
Keywords: deregulation; neo-liberalism; occupational health and safety; responsive regulation; risk
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Research Group: Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC)
Item ID: 36320
Depositing User: Steve Tombs
Date Deposited: 24 Jan 2013 12:13
Last Modified: 07 Aug 2019 05:39
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/36320
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU