The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Rethinking policy-related research: charting a path using qualitative comparative analysis and complexity theory

Blackman, Tim (2013). Rethinking policy-related research: charting a path using qualitative comparative analysis and complexity theory. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences , 8(3) pp. 333–345.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (139Kb) | Preview
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2012.751500
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article argues that conventional quantitative and qualitative research methods have largely failed to provide policy practitioners with the knowledge they need for decision making. These methods often have difficulty handling real world complexity, especially complex causality. This is when the mechanism of change is a combination of conditions that occur in a system such as an organisation or locality. A better approach is to use Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), a hybrid qualitative/quantitative method that enables logical reasoning about actual cases, their conditions, and how outcomes emerge from combinations of these conditions. Taken together these comprise a system, and the method works well with a whole system view, avoiding reductionism to individual behaviours by accounting for determinants that operate at levels beyond individuals. Using logical reduction, QCA identifies causal mechanisms in sub-types of cases differentiated by what matters to whether the outcome happens or not. In contrast to common variable-based methods such as multiple regression, which are divorced from actual case realities, QCA is case-based and rooted in these realities. The use of qualitative descriptors of conditions such as ways of working engages practitioners, while their standardisation enables systematic comparison and a degree of generalisation about ‘why’ questions that qualitative techniques typically do not achieve. The type of QCA described in the article requires conditions and outcomes to be dichotomised as present or absent, which is helpful to practitioners facing binary decisions about whether to do (a) or (b), or whether or not an outcome has been achieved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2013 Academy of Social Sciences
ISSN: 2158-205X
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Not SetNot SetNational Institute for Health Research
Extra Information: Special Issue: Knowledge Mobilisation and the Social Sciences: Research Impact and Engagement
Keywords: qualitative comparative analysis; complexity theory; evidence-based policy
Academic Unit/Department: Other Departments > Other Departments
Item ID: 35656
Depositing User: Tim Blackman
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2012 15:22
Last Modified: 03 Jan 2014 14:02
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/35656
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk