van Deemter, Kees; Gatt, Albert; van der Sluis, Ielka and Power, Richard
(2012).
|
|
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download Click here to request a copy from the OU Author. |
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: | http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01259.x |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
This response discusses the experiment reported in Krahmer et al.’s Letter to the Editor of Cognitive Science. We observe that their results do not tell us whether the Incremental Algorithm is better or worse than its competitors, and we speculate about implications for reference in complex domains, and for learning from ‘‘normal” (i.e., non-semantically-balanced) corpora.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright Holders: | 2012 Cognitive Science Society Inc. |
| ISSN: | 0364-0213 |
| Academic Unit/Department: | Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing |
| Interdisciplinary Research Centre: | Centre for Research in Computing (CRC) |
| Item ID: | 35169 |
| Depositing User: | Richard Power |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Nov 2012 11:07 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2012 15:31 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/35169 |
Actions (login may be required)
| View Item | |
| Public: Report issue / request change |




