Gow, J. P. D.; Murray, N. J.; Hall, D. J.; Clarke, A. S.; Burt, D.; Endicott, J. and Holland, A. D.
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (467Kb) | Preview
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1117/12.925980|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Euclid is a medium class mission selected for launch in 2019, with a primary goal to study the dark universe using the weak lensing and baryonic acoustic oscillations techniques. Weak lensing depends on accurate shape measurements, therefore it is beneficial that the effects of radiation-induced charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) in the Euclid CCD over the six year mission are understood and minimised. This paper describes the initial evaluation of the tolerance to radiation induced charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) of the CCD273 produced by e2v technologies plc, making comparisons with the previous CCD selected for Euclid the CCD203. The CCD273 benefits from the inclusion of a charge injection structure for trap suppression and a reduction in the register channel width. The improvement in tolerance to radiation induced serial CTI achieved by reducing the channel width from 50 um to 20 um was measured experimentally to be a factor of 1.7, which compares well to a factor of 1.9 found using a charge volume model.
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Copyright Holders:||2012 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers|
|Extra Information:||Proc. SPIE 8453, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy V, 845316 (September 25, 2012);|
|Keywords:||CCD; Euclid; proton radiation damage; n-channel; charge transfer efficiency|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Science > Physical Sciences
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)|
|Depositing User:||Jason Gow|
|Date Deposited:||31 Oct 2012 10:31|
|Last Modified:||24 Feb 2016 04:16|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.