Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
In September 2012 the British media was agog at the news that a female soldier, serving in Afghanistan was rushed into emergency care where she gave birth to a baby five weeks prematurely. Much was made of the fact that the medical team was not equipped to handle obstetrics which meant that qualified pediatric staff had to travel from the UK with an incubator. The woman, Lance Bombardier Lynette Pearce, was described as ‘unknowingly’ pregnant having conceived shortly before deployment to Helmand (Hough & Pearlman 2012). Along with the routine medical explanations as to how pregnancy can be undetected for so long, commentary also dwelt on the question whether women should have a routine urine test before serving on the front line. It soon emerged that up to 200 British female soldiers had been ‘aero medically evacuated’ from war zones in Afghanistan and Iraq because of pregnancy over the previous five years (Hough & Farmer 2012). The coverage was in stark contract to a feature that ran just a few weeks earlier which highlighted the use of female soldiers in Afghanistan as a ‘secret weapon’ (Baskerville 2012).
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Copyright Holders:||2013 Vron Ware|
|Keywords:||military; intersectionality; soldiers; diversity; war; militarisation; ethnicity|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Social Sciences > Sociology|
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)|
|Depositing User:||Vron Ware|
|Date Deposited:||21 Nov 2012 12:55|
|Last Modified:||28 Jan 2014 19:59|
Actions (login may be required)
|Report issue / request change|