PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (86Kb) | Preview
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-012-0169-x|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
What does it mean to say that an emotional response fits the situation? This question cannot be answered simply by specifying the core relational theme (loss or risk, say) associated with each emotion: we must also explain what constitutes an emotionally significant loss or risk. It is sometimes suggested that emotionally significant situations are those that bear on the subject’s interests or concerns. I accept that this claim is plausible for some emotional responses, and I propose a particular way of interpreting it. I suggest that, for many emotions, emotional significance is determined by the subject’s likes and dislikes – that is, settled dispositions to find a certain situation pleasant or distressing. I contrast this account with other preference-based accounts and with an account that appeals to the subject’s interests. I argue that we should prefer the likes-based account to these rival views.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.|
|Keywords:||emotion; norms; likes; desires; interests|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Arts > Philosophy
|Depositing User:||Carolyn Price|
|Date Deposited:||16 Oct 2012 13:53|
|Last Modified:||23 Feb 2016 20:53|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.